How to get knowledge in our life??

Define knowledge

Many comrades send me requests for valuable books on this point or a reference on another topic. I as a rule feel conflicted when reading these petitions because it is respectful to give a sign just because I did not overlook the RFP and if I understood what I would now understand, the individual asking would specify me would prefer not to help him.

The information is pretty much a journey like a train project with stations. The railway track takes you through trails and mountains, but there is no final stop. The last stop passes. However, before boarding this train, the traveler should prepare some exceptionally basic supplies for an outing.

There is a truism that says "Don't show children what they should perceive - show them how they learn". This also applies to all of us and before we start the information journey we have to figure out how to get this information.

Get knowledge

I anticipate that I am careful regarding the question of profound energies and need to explore whether other energies are valid and logical or just pseudoscience, then I cannot ask any individual who does not acknowledge the study of deep energies to suggest me a book relating to the question because he would recommend a book that denies otherworldly energies in moderation from Having a previous ending regarding the subject on the other hand, I can't ask someone who acknowledges other energies to suggest a book for me because he would. Recommend a book that supports thought.

This problem puts the problem specialist towards the beginning of the journey, as he needs more logical credit to sort out the chatter, so he is contributing his time and effort at random, which may be right or frustrating. Every now and then he sees how strangers assembled the pyramids, and at different times he learns about the ability of the US armed forces to control the climate, or he discovers the development of the Maya and their cosmic capabilities at all, so he can't tell what's right and what's up.

I suggest that everyone keen on self-examination and information begins by focusing on plausible paradoxes. There are about 300 legitimate misconceptions (formal and informal) that would equate to destroying the framework in the analyst's mind and reinstalling another created framework suitable for basic examination.

In the wake of clearing out legitimate errors I suggest that he research the way of thinking of science and obtain the discrepancy between logical content and logical technique, since today's logical material will not be the same tomorrow, whatever logical strategy is a device for obtaining this data and constructing this material.

The next stage is that we take a quick look at the certainly information hypothesis called epistemology, which gives a sense of how information is obtained and explains some blunders such as confirmation of ideas and what is the discrepancy between information about something or belief in it. something.

This interaction may require two months, but after the completion of these means, the analyst can leave on the information train. Following these means reinforces a framework that is impervious to litter and gossip and gives certainty that not being aware of something is not an error or distortion, but rather an initial stage in obtaining information.